On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 9:55 AM <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 09:51 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 8:54 AM Richard Purdie > > <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > We had interesting failures where building gcc-cross-powerpc with > > > 5.0 kernel > > > headers, then building eudev after moving to 5.2 headers failed. > > > > > > gcc-cross doesn't rebuild when linux-libc-headers changes due to > > > its > > > listing in SIGGEN_EXCLUDE_SAFE_RECIPE_DEPS. This shouldn't matter > > > but > > > fixincludes as adding asm-generic/socket.h to its filtered list > > > which > > > was then replacing the real header with an older version. This > > > mismatch > > > lead to build failures. > > > > > > We trust the Linux kernel headers to be ANSI safe so lets just > > > clear out > > > any headers and trust the originals to be correct. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> > > > --- > > > meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc > > > b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc > > > index 6222c2e8c91..e417b898734 100644 > > > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross.inc > > > @@ -196,6 +196,8 @@ do_install () { > > > # We use libiberty from binutils > > > find ${D}${exec_prefix}/lib -name libiberty.a | xargs rm -f > > > find ${D}${exec_prefix}/lib -name libiberty.h | xargs rm -f > > > + > > > + find ${D}${libdir}/gcc/${TARGET_SYS}/${BINV}/include-fixed > > > -type f -not -name "README" -not -name limits.h -not -name > > > syslimits.h | xargs rm -f > > > > Whats different for limits.h and syslimits.h as compared to standard > > headers from libc, Maybe we should just get that sorted as well while > > here > > limits.h looks to be gcc specific additions/fallback. syslimits.h is > just a passthrough. I decided to go with less risk in the patch and > leave those as is but am open to more investigation. >
fixed limits.h needs syslimits.h so either both go or both stay > I suspect limits.h is there for pre glibc bootstrap? thats right. > > Cheers, > > Richard > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core