On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:10:33PM -0600, Joshua Watt wrote: > > On 1/23/20 4:05 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >>On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> > >>> > >>>Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted Firmware-A). > >>>To avoid duplicating efforts of adding very similar recipes to BSP layers, > >>>add an upstream reference implementation to openembedded-core, which can be > >>>customized by BSPs, if needed. > >>Isn't this one of the things that Jon Mason is trying to > >>standardize/support in meta-arm ? > >> > >>http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-arm/tree/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/trusted-firmware-a > >Ah, interesting, somehow I totally missed that one! :) > > > >What triggered this submission is that we have our own variant in meta-ti and > >Joshua Watt was adding a very similar one to meta-rockchip: > >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/topic/70054501#48116 > > FWIW, variants of this recipe crop up in pretty much every ARM-based > BSP layer (e.g. > https://github.com/alistair23/meta-pine64/blob/master/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2.1.bb); > it seems common enough that a base recipe that each BSP layer can > bbappend to suite their needs seems like it would be useful?
Yes, indeed, hence we agreed to submit it to oe-core... And meta-arm sounds like a good idea and can be used by all those ARM-based BSPs as a base, but for some reason I cannot find any announcements for that new layer... Jon? -- Denys > >>What's the delta between the two ? > >Hmm, that one uses older 2.1 version. Other than that, I'll need to test to > >see if it's as adaptable and expandable as our more simplistic variants... > > > -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
