On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 5:16 PM Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:10:33PM -0600, Joshua Watt wrote: > > > > On 1/23/20 4:05 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > >On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 04:43:23PM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > > >>On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 4:00 PM Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>From: Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> > > >>> > > >>>Many BSPs require ARM Trusted Firmware (also known as Trusted > > >>>Firmware-A). > > >>>To avoid duplicating efforts of adding very similar recipes to BSP > > >>>layers, > > >>>add an upstream reference implementation to openembedded-core, which can > > >>>be > > >>>customized by BSPs, if needed. > > >>Isn't this one of the things that Jon Mason is trying to > > >>standardize/support in meta-arm ? > > >> > > >>http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-arm/tree/meta-arm/recipes-bsp/trusted-firmware-a > > >Ah, interesting, somehow I totally missed that one! :) > > > > > >What triggered this submission is that we have our own variant in meta-ti > > >and > > >Joshua Watt was adding a very similar one to meta-rockchip: > > >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/topic/70054501#48116 > > > > FWIW, variants of this recipe crop up in pretty much every ARM-based > > BSP layer (e.g. > > https://github.com/alistair23/meta-pine64/blob/master/recipes-bsp/arm-trusted-firmware/arm-trusted-firmware_2.1.bb); > > it seems common enough that a base recipe that each BSP layer can > > bbappend to suite their needs seems like it would be useful? > > Yes, indeed, hence we agreed to submit it to oe-core... > > And meta-arm sounds like a good idea and can be used by all those ARM-based > BSPs as a base, but for some reason I cannot find any announcements for that > new layer... Jon?
Sorry, I was unaware that it was common practice to announce this kind of thing. Also, it was very barebones for the first few weeks. In fact, I still think it is minimal. That being said, I'll send email to OE-devel (and/or OE-Core) announcing it properly. Thanks, Jon > > -- > Denys > > > > >>What's the delta between the two ? > > >Hmm, that one uses older 2.1 version. Other than that, I'll need to test to > > >see if it's as adaptable and expandable as our more simplistic variants... > > > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
