On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:18 PM Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > > As discussed in the bugzilla entry, musl is not compatible with multilibs > and has no plans to support this. Therefore tell users this from the > recipe rather than letting them run into build failures. >
I dont think thats the case anymore, I have sent patches to fix multilib on musl. this seems a broad brush. What are you trying to fix ? > [YOCTO #13122] > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > --- > meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc b/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc > index bdce412162c..f2f3d3d054b 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl.inc > @@ -29,3 +29,9 @@ ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET_armv4 = "arm" > B = "${WORKDIR}/build" > > do_configure[cleandirs] = "${B}" > + > +python () { > + multilibs = d.getVar("MULTILIBS") > + if multilibs: > + raise bb.parse.SkipRecipe("musl is not compatible with multilibs") > +} > -- > 2.25.1 >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#137125): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/137125 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/72886268/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
