On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 16:45 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:18 PM Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > As discussed in the bugzilla entry, musl is not compatible with > > multilibs > > and has no plans to support this. Therefore tell users this from > > the > > recipe rather than letting them run into build failures. > > > > I dont think thats the case anymore, I have sent patches to fix > multilib on musl. this seems a broad brush. What are you trying to > fix ?
The bug said we don't support multilib and musl and the code clearly currently doesn't, so this patch was to make the situation clearer to users. Based on the need for your patch and other patches, its clear that musl and multilib doesn't work as things stand today. The question becomes whether we want to support that? Do we want/need to add automated tests for it? We've built 3.1 rc2 which is in QA so this wasn't going into the release, maybe the point release, or if we rebuild for some reason. I do want to do something with the bug. If we want to enable multilib with musl that would be a 3.2 activity. Perhaps we should merge this change, then remove it when the other issues are fixed? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#137140): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/137140 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/72886268/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
