I see Richard has merged these to master-next, thanks!
And thanks Joshua for volunteering to maintain these recipes :)
I submitted removal patches to meta-python.

So, it is good we are getting this extra dependency resolved in master. The 
question is - can we get these backported to dunfell, does it qualify?

Otherwise Jon wanted to finally branch off meta-arm into dunfell today and 
we'll have to live with it until gatesgarth.

-- 
Denys


On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:04:54PM -0500, Joshua Watt wrote:
> Imports and upgrades pycryptodome, pycryptodomex, and pyelftools from
> meta-python.  These recipes are commonly used by other layers (e.g.
> meta-arm) so putting them in oe-core reduces layer dependencies.
> 
> Joshua Watt (4):
>   pycryptodome: Import from meta-python
>   pyelftools: Import from meta-python
>   python3-pycryptodome(x): Upgrade 3.9.4 -> 3.9.7
>   python3-pyelftools: Upgrade 0.25 -> 0.26
> 
>  meta/conf/distro/include/maintainers.inc      |  5 +++-
>  .../python/python-pycryptodome.inc            | 26 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../python/python3-pycryptodome_3.9.7.bb      |  5 ++++
>  .../python/python3-pycryptodomex_3.9.7.bb     |  9 +++++++
>  .../python/python3-pyelftools_0.26.bb         | 14 ++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python-pycryptodome.inc
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pycryptodome_3.9.7.bb
>  create mode 100644 
> meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pycryptodomex_3.9.7.bb
>  create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3-pyelftools_0.26.bb
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#138338): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138338
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74214757/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub  
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to