On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:06 AM Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-05-15 at 14:53 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > I see Richard has merged these to master-next, thanks! > > And thanks Joshua for volunteering to maintain these recipes :) > > I submitted removal patches to meta-python. > > > > So, it is good we are getting this extra dependency resolved in master. The > > question is - can we get these backported to dunfell, does it qualify? > > > > Otherwise Jon wanted to finally branch off meta-arm into dunfell today and > > we'll have to live with it until gatesgarth. > > I put them into -next so we could test them, see if the autobuilder had > any surprises. Good news is there weren't any. > > The question still remains whether this is the best approach or not and > some people I talked to were not convinced that a consensus had been > reached. > > The question I guess is how widely used is optee and does it warrant > adding this? Its a little ironic the thing people want is trusted- > firmware...
I'm seeing a few votes of "yes for dunfell" and no opposition as yet (at least here on the list). I support the desire to get rid of a meta-python dependency in bsp layers so I'm also a yes vote unless someone comes up with a good reason why we shouldn't. Steve > Cheers, > > Richard > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#138356): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/138356 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74214757/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
