On Tue, 2020-06-02 at 22:00 +0200, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 02:17:22PM +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > In case of a read-only rootfs, one could add some logic to remove > > them > > if one really wants to shave those few dozens of bytes off. > > Note that there's also a slight runtime performance penalty > associated > with having these files in place if they're not doing anything > useful. > It'd be nice to try to make sure that nothing regresses in that area.
I understand the concern, I am a little torn on this as adding in too many different controls and options complicates the test matrix and makes things harder for users. You're effectively suggesting a new DISTRO_FEATURE to control this? or maybe better, perhaps a glibc PACKAGECONFIG? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#139122): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/139122 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/74625854/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
