On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:24:24PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On (15/12/11 12:16), Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:49 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Richard Purdie > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Khem, > > > > > > > > What's puzzling me is that reading through this patch, we already do > > > > what this patch is doing? > > > > > > > > Where is the difference which this patch is fixing? > > > > > > > > > > this does essentially what we were doing earlier but this one is going > > > to go upstream > > > > Yes, that is good and I'm fine with the patch for that reason. > > there is additional detail that this patch does which is that in order > to make gxx-includes to be sysroot relative --with-cxx-include option to > be also specified relative to initials sysroot during configure time > > e.g. --with-sysroot=SYSROOT --with-gxx-include-dir=SYSROOT/usr/include/c++ > > since the original behavior of --with-gxx-include-dir is to specify an > absolute path that is preserved whereas the patch we have in OE relocates > gxx-include-dir regardless.Therefore in order to adopt this patch we have > to use the above syntax which was original syntax before the above patch > and would make up forward compatible provided this patch makes into gcc > upstream. > > > > > > > > > > I appreciate that patch adds in the prefix to the --with-gxx-include-dir > > > > option but it then removes it again during configure so this should be a > > > > null op. Both versions of the patch set the "1" bit in gcc/cppdefault.c. > > > > > > > > So where is the change this patch makes which fixes things? > > > > > > changing --with-gxx-include-dir to be within sysroot triggers the > > > relocation code. > > > > But we were already triggering the relocation code? > > > > I can't see *any* functionality difference between these, they should > > both just give the same result as far as I can tell... > > > same functionality but with a different usage see above > > > Claiming it fixes things is therefore concerning me. > > correct it does not fix anything actually that I know was broken before > Thinking out loud given that with-gxx-include-dir is absolute in nature it > could be > the original patch we have, does not work in some weird case since the > absolute path we use is still /usr/include/c++ during configure time. > although I would expect that the include poisoning warning will report it if > that > happened > > -Khem
Is there some pending patch for meta-oe/gcc? I have some issues while rebuilding toolchain from scratch after this patchset: armv7a: | /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/rtl.h:2163:12: note: expected 'enum machine_mode' but argument is of type 'int' | gcc -c -isystem/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include -O2 -pipe -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/. -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../include -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/calls.c -o calls.o | /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/calls.c: In function 'initialize_argument_information': | /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/calls.c:1089:9: error: 'STACK_CHECK_MAX_VAR_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function) | /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/calls.c:1089:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in | make[2]: *** [calls.o] Error 1 armv4t: | gcc -c -isystem/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include -O2 -pipe -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/. -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../include -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libcpp/include -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber insn-output.c -o insn-output.o | In file included from insn-emit.c:23:0: | /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/constraints.md: In function 'satisfies_constraint_Uu': | /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/constraints.md:353:6: warning: implicit declaration of function 'thumb1_legitimate_address_p' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] | insn-opinit.c: In function 'init_all_optabs': | insn-opinit.c:25:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'set_widening_optab_handler' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] | insn-opinit.c:30:7: error: 'TARGET_IDIV' undeclared (first use in this function) | insn-opinit.c:30:7: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in | insn-opinit.c:813:32: error: 'vec_load_lanes_optab' undeclared (first use in this function) | insn-opinit.c:833:32: error: 'vec_store_lanes_optab' undeclared (first use in this function) | insn-opinit.c:1009:24: error: 'vec_widen_sshiftl_lo_optab' undeclared (first use in this function) | insn-opinit.c:1011:24: error: 'vec_widen_ushiftl_lo_optab' undeclared (first use in this function) | insn-opinit.c:1021:24: error: 'vec_widen_sshiftl_hi_optab' undeclared (first use in this function) | insn-opinit.c:1023:24: error: 'vec_widen_ushiftl_hi_optab' undeclared (first use in this function) | make[2]: *** [insn-opinit.o] Error 1 | make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
