On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:37:34AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:07:56AM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 01:24:24PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On (15/12/11 12:16), Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 07:49 -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Richard Purdie > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Khem, > > > > > > > > > > > > What's puzzling me is that reading through this patch, we already do > > > > > > what this patch is doing? > > > > > > > > > > > > Where is the difference which this patch is fixing? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this does essentially what we were doing earlier but this one is going > > > > > to go upstream > > > > > > > > Yes, that is good and I'm fine with the patch for that reason. > > > > > > there is additional detail that this patch does which is that in order > > > to make gxx-includes to be sysroot relative --with-cxx-include option to > > > be also specified relative to initials sysroot during configure time > > > > > > e.g. --with-sysroot=SYSROOT --with-gxx-include-dir=SYSROOT/usr/include/c++ > > > > > > since the original behavior of --with-gxx-include-dir is to specify an > > > absolute path that is preserved whereas the patch we have in OE relocates > > > gxx-include-dir regardless.Therefore in order to adopt this patch we have > > > to use the above syntax which was original syntax before the above patch > > > and would make up forward compatible provided this patch makes into gcc > > > upstream. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I appreciate that patch adds in the prefix to the > > > > > > --with-gxx-include-dir > > > > > > option but it then removes it again during configure so this should > > > > > > be a > > > > > > null op. Both versions of the patch set the "1" bit in > > > > > > gcc/cppdefault.c. > > > > > > > > > > > > So where is the change this patch makes which fixes things? > > > > > > > > > > changing --with-gxx-include-dir to be within sysroot triggers the > > > > > relocation code. > > > > > > > > But we were already triggering the relocation code? > > > > > > > > I can't see *any* functionality difference between these, they should > > > > both just give the same result as far as I can tell... > > > > > > > same functionality but with a different usage see above > > > > > > > Claiming it fixes things is therefore concerning me. > > > > > > correct it does not fix anything actually that I know was broken before > > > Thinking out loud given that with-gxx-include-dir is absolute in nature > > > it could be > > > the original patch we have, does not work in some weird case since the > > > absolute path we use is still /usr/include/c++ during configure time. > > > although I would expect that the include poisoning warning will report it > > > if that > > > happened > > > > > > -Khem > > > > Is there some pending patch for meta-oe/gcc? > > > > I have some issues while rebuilding toolchain from scratch after this > > patchset: > > > > armv7a: > > | > > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/rtl.h:2163:12: > > note: expected 'enum machine_mode' but argument is of type 'int' > > | gcc -c > > -isystem/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include -O2 -pipe > > -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format-attribute > > -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings > > -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/. > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../include > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libcpp/include > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd > > -I../libdecnumber > > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/calls.c > > -o calls.o > > | > > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/calls.c: > > In function 'initialize_argument_information': > > | > > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/calls.c:1089:9: > > error: 'STACK_CHECK_MAX_VAR_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function) > > | > > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/calls.c:1089:9: > > note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function > > it appears in > > | make[2]: *** [calls.o] Error 1 > > > > armv4t: > > | gcc -c > > -isystem/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/include -O2 -pipe > > -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual > > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format-attribute > > -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings > > -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/. > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../include > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libcpp/include > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber > > > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd > > -I../libdecnumber insn-output.c -o insn-output.o > > | In file included from insn-emit.c:23:0: > > | > > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/constraints.md: > > In function 'satisfies_constraint_Uu': > > | > > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/constraints.md:353:6: > > warning: implicit declaration of function 'thumb1_legitimate_address_p' > > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > | insn-opinit.c: In function 'init_all_optabs': > > | insn-opinit.c:25:5: warning: implicit declaration of function > > 'set_widening_optab_handler' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > | insn-opinit.c:30:7: error: 'TARGET_IDIV' undeclared (first use in this > > function) > > | insn-opinit.c:30:7: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only > > once for each function it appears in > > | insn-opinit.c:813:32: error: 'vec_load_lanes_optab' undeclared (first use > > in this function) > > | insn-opinit.c:833:32: error: 'vec_store_lanes_optab' undeclared (first > > use in this function) > > | insn-opinit.c:1009:24: error: 'vec_widen_sshiftl_lo_optab' undeclared > > (first use in this function) > > | insn-opinit.c:1011:24: error: 'vec_widen_ushiftl_lo_optab' undeclared > > (first use in this function) > > | insn-opinit.c:1021:24: error: 'vec_widen_sshiftl_hi_optab' undeclared > > (first use in this function) > > | insn-opinit.c:1023:24: error: 'vec_widen_ushiftl_hi_optab' undeclared > > (first use in this function) > > | make[2]: *** [insn-opinit.o] Error 1 > > | make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > > and different one for armv5te too: > | GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic > -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings > -Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/. > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../include > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libcpp/include > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber > > -I/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd > -I../libdecnumber > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/cgraphbuild.c > -o cgraphbuild.o > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: > In function 'bounds_check': > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:9204:5: > warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments > [-Wformat-security] > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: > In function 'arm_print_operand': > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:16786:4: > warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments > [-Wformat-security] > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: > In function 'arm_init_neon_builtins': > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:19270:4: > error: 'neon_struct_operand' undeclared (first use in this function) > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:19270:4: > note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it > appears in > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c: > At top level: > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:6753:1: > warning: 'arm_legitimate_constant_p' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > | > /OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work-shared/gcc-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:22697:1: > warning: 'arm_array_mode_supported_p' defined but not used > [-Wunused-function] > | make[2]: *** [arm.o] Error 1 > | make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > | rm gcov.pod cpp.pod gfdl.pod gcc.pod fsf-funding.pod > | make[2]: Leaving directory > `/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv5te-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-initial/4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/build.x86_64-linux.arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc' > | make[1]: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 > | make[1]: Leaving directory > `/OE/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/armv5te-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-initial/4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/build.x86_64-linux.arm-oe-linux-gnueabi' > | make: *** [all] Error 2
without PARALLEL_MAKE="-j4" BB_NUMBER_THREADS = "2" I've managed to build toolchain for one arch, but after switching MACHINE it fails again: | Checking multilib configuration for libgcc... | Configuring in arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/libgcc | configure: loading cache ./config.cache | configure: error: `CC' has changed since the previous run: | configure: former value: ` /OE/shr-core/tmp/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross/4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/build.x86_64-linux.arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/./gcc/xgcc -B/OE/shr-core/tmp/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross/4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/build.x86_64-linux.arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/./gcc/ -march=armv7-a -fno-tree-vectorize -mthumb-interwork -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon -mtune=cortex-a8 -isystem/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/nokia900/usr/include -B/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/bin/ -B/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/lib/ -isystem /OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/include -isystem /OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/sys-include --sysroot=/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/nokia900 ' | configure: current value: ` /OE/shr-core/tmp/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross/4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/build.x86_64-linux.arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/./gcc/xgcc -B/OE/shr-core/tmp/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross/4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/build.x86_64-linux.arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/./gcc/ -march=armv7-a -fno-tree-vectorize -mthumb-interwork -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon -mtune=cortex-a8 -isystem/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/palmpre/usr/include -B/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/arm-oeERROR: Function 'do_compile' failed (see /OE/shr-core/tmp/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross/4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/temp/log.do_compile.13936 for further information) | -linux-gnueabi/bin/ -B/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/lib/ -isystem /OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/include -isystem /OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/sys-include --sysroot=/OE/shr-core/tmp/sysroots/palmpre ' | configure: error: in `/OE/shr-core/tmp/work/armv7a-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross/4.6.2+svnr181430-r23/gcc-4_6-branch/build.x86_64-linux.arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi/libgcc': | configure: error: changes in the environment can compromise the build | configure: error: run `make distclean' and/or `rm ./config.cache' and start over | make: *** [configure-target-libgcc] Error 1 | + die 'oe_runmake failed' | + bbfatal 'oe_runmake failed' | + echo 'ERROR: oe_runmake failed' | ERROR: oe_runmake failed | + exit 1 NOTE: package gcc-cross-4.6.2+svnr181430-r23: task do_compile: Failed ERROR: Task 131 (/OE/shr-core/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.6.bb, do_compile) failed with exit code '1' maybe it's because something was reused from work-shared? Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
