On 12/16/2020 6:50 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-connectivity/iproute2/iproute2.inc
>> @@ -46,10 +46,11 @@ do_install () {
>> # The .so files in iproute2-tc are modules, not traditional
>> libraries
>> INSANE_SKIP_${PN}-tc = "dev-so"
>>
>> -PACKAGES =+ "\
>> +IPROUTE2_PACKAGES =+ "\
>> ${PN}-devlink \
>> ${PN}-genl \
>> ${PN}-ifstat \
>> + ${PN}-ip \
>> ${PN}-lnstat \
>> ${PN}-nstat \
>> ${PN}-rtacct \
>> @@ -58,12 +59,17 @@ PACKAGES =+ "\
>> ${PN}-tipc \
>> "
>>
>> +PACKAGES += "${IPROUTE2_PACKAGES}"
>> +PROVIDES += "${IPROUTE2_PACKAGES}"
> This doesn't look correct. Why do we need to add all the individual
> package splits to PROVIDES?
>
I want to add iproute2-ip into my IMAGE_INSTALL and not take the rest
of the iproute2-$foo packages. If I don't add PROVIDES, build stage
fails saying nobody provides iproute2-ip.
>
> or is there some other reason for this? This is basically the issue
> with some of the other package splits too, its not using the build time
> verses runtime namespaces correctly.
If I misunderstood something or am not doing it right, let me know.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#145766):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/145766
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/78992706/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
