On Sun, 2021-01-24 at 07:18 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: > Branch: master > > New this week: > CVE-2013-0800: pixman > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2013-0800 * > CVE-2019-1543: openssl > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1543 * > CVE-2019-1547: openssl > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1547 * > CVE-2019-1549: openssl > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1549 * > CVE-2019-1551: openssl > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1551 * > CVE-2019-1552: openssl > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1552 * > CVE-2019-1563: openssl > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2019-1563 * > CVE-2020-14409: libsdl2 > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2020-14409 * > CVE-2020-14410: libsdl2 > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2020-14410 * > CVE-2020-1967: openssl > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2020-1967 * > CVE-2020-1971: openssl > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2020-1971 *
Adding Chee Yang, did the recent cve-check change mean some version comparisons regressed and exposed CVEs that shouldn't be in this list, or were we making some we need to fix? Or did some other change expose these? Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#147147): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/147147 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/80091462/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
