On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:44 AM Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Right here: https://busybox.net/ > I see. Gap between 1.32.0 and 1.32.1 release was about 6 months, I am not sure if all distros are waiting for dot releases or not. I see that upcoming fedora 34 ( due in April ) is already packaging busybox 1.33.0
> Alex > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 18:37, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 2/22/21 8:39 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: >> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 17:02, Richard Purdie >> > <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > >> > > +UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI = "https://busybox.net/ <https://busybox.net/>" >> > > +UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX = "BusyBox\ (?P<pver>\d+\.\d+\.\d+)\ >> > \(stable\)" >> > I just realised/wondered whether: >> > >> > inherit upstream-version-is-even >> > >> > would work here? >> > >> > >> > I don't think so - busybox seems to declare x.y.0 as unstable, and >> > everything else as stable. >> > >> >> is it documented somewhere that x.y.0 is unstable ? >> https://git.busybox.net/busybox/commit/?id=a4c3a341394a1fb25be8c15d2ddfe3ec77cbb83c >> >> seems to indicate its a normal release. >> >> > Alex >> > >> > >> > >> >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#148489): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/148489 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/80827528/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
