On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:32 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Joshua Lock <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have witnessed non-deterministic failures of perf for some platforms > > whilst looking for bfd.h, a header provided by binutils. > > > > Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <[email protected]> > > --- > > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > > b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > > index 950f197..aa45dba 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc > > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ addtask install_perf after do_install before do_package > > do_compile_perf[umask] = 022 > > do_install_perf[umask] = 022 > > > > -PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot > > ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot" > > +PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot > > ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot > > ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" > > Does this build the rpm for binutils too? I've seen the following > error recently when creating the rfs: > > | error: Failed dependencies: > | binutils >= 2.21.1a is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds > | libbfd-2.21.1.so is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds
I suspect the patch is not enough to fix this... Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
