On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 16:32 +0000, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Joshua Lock <[email protected]> wrote: >> > We have witnessed non-deterministic failures of perf for some platforms >> > whilst looking for bfd.h, a header provided by binutils. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc | 2 +- >> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> > b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> > index 950f197..aa45dba 100644 >> > --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> > +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-tools.inc >> > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ addtask install_perf after do_install before do_package >> > do_compile_perf[umask] = 022 >> > do_install_perf[umask] = 022 >> > >> > -PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot >> > ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot" >> > +PERFDEPENDS = "virtual/${MLPREFIX}libc:do_populate_sysroot >> > ${MLPREFIX}elfutils:do_populate_sysroot >> > ${MLPREFIX}binutils:do_populate_sysroot" >> >> Does this build the rpm for binutils too? I've seen the following >> error recently when creating the rfs: >> >> | error: Failed dependencies: >> | binutils >= 2.21.1a is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds >> | libbfd-2.21.1.so is needed by perf-3.0.6-r2.p3060qds > > I suspect the patch is not enough to fix this...
The error went away after adding this, but I'm not 100% the rpm's where not available the next time regardless of this patch. -M _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
