As exposed in the ML https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/153000
up to commit 86142da in Gatesgarth it was possible to build a second mini-kernel w/out modules to be just deployed and collected by other recipes. These kernels use special care to avoid packaging: inherit nopackages PACKAGES = "" PROVIDES = "" Now the change in kernel.bblass calls a packaging routine: do_deploy[prefuncs] += "read_subpackage_metadata" As a result the kernel build fails. Fix this using bb.data.inherits_class() to verify the possible previous inherit of nopackages.bbclass. Signed-off-by: Andrea Adami <[email protected]> --- meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass index 379bed44f2..06e6446a08 100644 --- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass @@ -771,8 +771,8 @@ kernel_do_deploy() { } # We deploy to filenames that include PKGV and PKGR, read the saved data to -# ensure we get the right values for both -do_deploy[prefuncs] += "read_subpackage_metadata" +# ensure we get the right values for both. Do this only if packaging is enabled. +do_deploy[prefuncs] += "${@ '' if bb.data.inherits_class('nopackages', d) else 'read_subpackage_metadata' }" addtask deploy after do_populate_sysroot do_packagedata -- 2.17.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#153219): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/153219 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/83725508/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
