On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 17:45 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 25/06/2021 14.16, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-06-25 at 09:37 +0200, Rasmus Villemoes via
> > lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > I noticed that if I have an image recipe that says
> > >
> > > IMAGE_INSTALL += "kernel-module-foo"
> > >
> > > it fails as expected when the kernel hasn't been built with CONFIG_FOO=m.
> > >
> > > However, if at the same time some other package which happens to get
> > > installed in the same image says
> > >
> > > RRECOMMENDS_${PN} += "kernel-module-foo"
> > >
> > > the image build silently succeeds, obviously without any foo.ko
> > > included. This doesn't seem right. [I'm well aware that the RRECOMMENDS
> > > line alone works as expected, this is about the case where both the
> > > above lines are in play.]
> >
> > Which package backend are you using and does this happen if you
> > use a different one, particularly swapping ipk and rpm?
> >
> > That might tell us if this is a package manager issue or a bitbake
> > metadata one.
>
> I was using ipk. It seems to work as expected (i.e. fail the build) when
> using rpm.
That is probably a bug that needs opening against opkg in bugzilla then.
Added Alex to Cc: (opkg maintainer).
Cheers,
Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#153281):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/153281
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/83779506/21656
Group Owner: openembedded-core+ow...@lists.openembedded.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
