On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 2:16 AM Damian Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > > ---- On Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:00:15 +0200 Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> > wrote ---- > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 2:48 AM Damian Wrobel > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Removes the /var/cache/ldconfig auxiliary cache directory from > > > the rootfs when: > > > - read-only-rootfs is in DISTRO_FEATURES, > > > - ldconfig is not in DISTRO_FEATURES. > > > > > > In both cases the /var/cache/ldconfig/aux-cache is useless. > > > > Should there be a test for package management being supported in the > > image too? A read-only rootfs is one case where it's not possible to > > install ldconfig support at run time but a writeable rootfs without > > package management support would seem to be another? > > It seems to be perfectly fine to use the ldconfig without having any package > management system.
Of course. But if ldconfig support is disabled at build time (ie the ldconfig distro feature is disabled) and there is no package management support (so ldconfig can not be installed at run time) then is there any need for /var/cache/ldconfig/aux-cache ?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#154118): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/154118 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/84375612/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
