On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Saul Wold <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 01/11/2012 11:00 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Eric Bénard<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Le Fri,  6 Jan 2012 20:51:54 -0800,
>>> Steve Sakoman<[email protected]>  a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> -FILES_dhcp-server = "${sbindir}/dhcpd ${sysconfdir}/init.d/dhcp-server
>>>> ${localstatedir}/lib/dhcp/"
>>>> +FILES_dhcp-server = "${sbindir}/dhcpd ${sysconfdir}/init.d/dhcp-server"
>>>
>>>
>>> isn't this directory necessary for dhcp-server ?
>>
>>
>> Sorry for the delay in responding!  I missed seeing your comment.
>>
>> Yes, both packages need this directory.  But the dhcp-server package
>> init already creates it if it doesn't exist:
>>
> You can still have it in the dhcp-server Package as long as the attributes
> (ownership, perm, ...) are the same and it's not a symlink, so please
> include it with the FILES-dhcp-server.

In my experience you can't add an item to more than one FILES spec.

I just did the experiment of including it in both client and server
FILES, and the directory only shows up it the one that occurs first,
server in this case.

I added the directory to the client FILES in my patch because I saw
that the server init creates the directory if it doesn't exist.

I still believe that the original patch is the best way to handle this.

Steve

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to