On 01/12/2012 01:56 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Saul Wold<[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/11/2012 11:00 AM, Steve Sakoman wrote:
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Eric Bénard<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Le Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:51:54 -0800,
Steve Sakoman<[email protected]> a écrit :
-FILES_dhcp-server = "${sbindir}/dhcpd ${sysconfdir}/init.d/dhcp-server
${localstatedir}/lib/dhcp/"
+FILES_dhcp-server = "${sbindir}/dhcpd ${sysconfdir}/init.d/dhcp-server"
isn't this directory necessary for dhcp-server ?
Sorry for the delay in responding! I missed seeing your comment.
Yes, both packages need this directory. But the dhcp-server package
init already creates it if it doesn't exist:
You can still have it in the dhcp-server Package as long as the attributes
(ownership, perm, ...) are the same and it's not a symlink, so please
include it with the FILES-dhcp-server.
In my experience you can't add an item to more than one FILES spec.
I just did the experiment of including it in both client and server
FILES, and the directory only shows up it the one that occurs first,
server in this case.
I added the directory to the client FILES in my patch because I saw
that the server init creates the directory if it doesn't exist.
I still believe that the original patch is the best way to handle this.
Fair enough, should I consider this RFC patch now the real patch or will
you resend?
Sau!
Steve
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
