On Fri, 2022-01-07 at 13:24 -0800, Saul Wold wrote: > Move the do_strip() functionality to a more common location in the > package split_and_strip_files() flow. This makes it possible for the > extended packaging data to be generated correctly for the kernel and > kernel modules. The KERNEL_IMAGE_STRIP_EXTRA_SECTIONS is reused in > the runstrip() part of package stripping. > > Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <[email protected]> > --- > meta/classes/kernel.bbclass | 35 +++-------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
As I mentioned in previous mails, I think this will mean the do_deploy output will change and become unstripped which may cause a problem for some platforms. We likely need to keep a strip task but call the new strip function from it? I personally think this is a reasonable direction apart from that though, at least in principle. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#160273): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/160273 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/88271781/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
