On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 07:14 +0000, Matthias Klein wrote: > Hello together, > > I would like to add a question to the topic: > > Why was the LTS period for dunfell extended? > Can we expect the same for kirstone?
The project members agreed to fun an extension to the lifetime of dunfell from 2 years to 4 years. There should have been some announcements about this but we lack people on the advocacy side of the project with time to make that happen. That saddens me a lot and I think it is a missed opportunity but there isn't much I can do about it beyond what I've already tried. Extending Dunfell is an experiment so we would base a decision on how well the dunfell extension is working out. Extending an LTS like this requires a financial commitment from the project. At this point in time the project cannot commit to extending kirkstone as we can't guarantee the finances. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#160564): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/160564 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/88419884/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
