Hi Alex On 1/20/22 4:28 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > I think this should cover aarch64 on aarch64 too :) And presence of > (and ability to open) /dev/kvm is probably a better check than looking > through cpuinfo?
Thanks for the review! However, my abilities to build and test on aarch64 are limited. At least this change would take me much more time to develop and is more likely to cause regressions. Wouldn't this version already be a worthy change for users? I'm not sure we have many users running QEMU on aarch64. Would automatically passing the "kvm" option on applicable cases have value in our automated tests? Cheers Michael. -- Michael Opdenacker, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#160776): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/160776 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/88560844/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
