On Thu, 20 Jan 2022 at 19:43, Michael Opdenacker < [email protected]> wrote:
> However, my abilities to build and test on aarch64 are limited. At least > this change would take me much more time to develop and is more likely > to cause regressions. > Checking for readability of /dev/kvm doesn't need aarch64 testing, it's universal and works on x86 too. It's a good check to do because quite often /dev/kvm has wrong permissions so attempting to auto-enable kvm is not going to work. > Wouldn't this version already be a worthy change for users? I'm not sure > we have many users running QEMU on aarch64. Would automatically passing > the "kvm" option on applicable cases have value in our automated tests? > Automated tests (e.g. bitbake -c testimage) already do this; the value is in manually starting runqemu. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#160778): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/160778 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/88560844/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
