On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 13:28, Richard Purdie <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-02-22 at 10:59 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > I have to note that YP does not support ppc systems as build hosts; > > can this be kept in a bbappend? > > It isn't official but there are obviously people using it. I think we should > try > and do something in core but there is a question of how we maintain this given > our infrastructure/tests don't cover it :(
Worse yet, there is no way to test this locally either. If the ppc64 binary tarball checksums are added to the core rust recipe, presumably I'd be expected to update them together with x86 and arm64 binary checksums on version updates, but I'd have to do this completely blindly with no testing of any kind :( That's why I am asking to keep them in an external bbappend. Andrew, how hard is it to obtain a shell on ppc64 machines nowadays? Is it something specific to your employer? Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#162134): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/162134 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/89310363/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
