On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 6:24 AM Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 at 13:28, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2022-02-22 at 10:59 +0100, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > > I have to note that YP does not support ppc systems as build hosts; > > > can this be kept in a bbappend? > > > > It isn't official but there are obviously people using it. I think we > > should try > > and do something in core but there is a question of how we maintain this > > given > > our infrastructure/tests don't cover it :( > > Worse yet, there is no way to test this locally either. If the ppc64 > binary tarball checksums are added to the core rust recipe, presumably > I'd be expected to update them together with x86 and arm64 binary > checksums on version updates, but I'd have to do this completely > blindly with no testing of any kind :(
as long as it does not impede main testing I would think thats ok and we can expect the OE community members like Andrew to test this and report issues or better fix them That's why I am asking to keep > them in an external bbappend. > > Andrew, how hard is it to obtain a shell on ppc64 machines nowadays? > Is it something specific to your employer? > > Alex > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#162187): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/162187 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/89310363/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
