On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 12:30 PM Ralph Siemsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 2:58 PM Steve Sakoman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Let me know if you make any progress!
>
> After a clean build, and messing about with VNC, I am now able to
> 'bitbake core-image-sato:do_testimage'.
>
> > Yes, either change will trigger the error. Without the zlib or xz
> > patches all is fine. Adding just one or the other will fail the
> > pkgman-deb-non-deb builds (and probably the pkgman-rpm-non-rpm builds
> > too, though I've been concentrating on the deb version to try to
> > isolate the offending patches)
>
> I have both gzip and xz patches applied:
> $ git log --oneline
> 52269ab7e7 (HEAD -> dunfell) gzip: fix CVE-2022-1271
> e7fa7a2a2c xz: fix CVE-2022-1271
> 38c55bd388 (origin/dunfell) tzdata: update to 2022a
> 86285152bd python3-jinja2: Correct HOMEPAGE
>
> With default PACKAGE_CLASSES = package_rpm
> RESULTS - dnf.DnfBasicTest.test_dnf_help: PASSED (8.77s)
> ...
> SUMMARY:
> core-image-sato () - Ran 64 tests in 242.039s
> core-image-sato - OK - All required tests passed (successes=35,
> skipped=29, failures=0, errors=0)
>
> With PACKAGE_CLASSES = package_deb
> RESULTS - apt.AptRepoTest.test_apt_install_from_repo: PASSED (43.98s)
> ...
> SUMMARY:
> core-image-sato () - Ran 64 tests in 57.334s
> core-image-sato - OK - All required tests passed (successes=15,
> skipped=49, failures=0, errors=0)
>
> So I do not seem to reproduce the error. Any ideas what else might
> differ in the autobuilder versus my local?
Sigh, I just ran the same experiment here with the same results - all is fine.
The setup json for the autobuilder run is:
"pkgman-deb-non-deb" : {
"MACHINE" : "qemux86",
"PACKAGE_CLASSES" : "package_deb",
"BBTARGETS" : "core-image-sato core-image-sato-sdk
core-image-minimal core-image-minimal-dev
core-image-sato:do_populate_sdk",
"SANITYTARGETS" : "core-image-minimal:do_testimage
core-image-sato:do_testimage core-image-sato-sdk:do_testimage
core-image-sato:do_testsdk"
},
I was using qemux86-64 for my experiment, so I guess I need to redo it
now using the correct machine!
Steve
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#164243):
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/164243
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/90107518/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
