Hi Steve, Steve Sakoman <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta, 13/04/2022 à(s) 18:37:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 6:41 AM Mike Crowe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 13 April 2022 at 06:02:22 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: > > > Both runs completed and I'm still seeing success without the zlib > patch: > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/50/builds/5069 > > > > > > and failure with the patch: > > > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/50/builds/5070 > > > > I'm certainly no expert with the autobuilder, but it looks like nothing > was > > actually compiled for both of those builds - everything came from the > > sstate cache. > > > > I believe that Ralph's reproduction of the test failure without the zlib > > patch was from a complete rebuild without anything coming from the sstate > > cache. > > > > I suspect that if a PR bump or something similar that causes zlib and all > > its reverse dependencies to be built were tested on top of the commit > used > > for build 5069 then the test failure would occur then as well and > > exonerate the zlib patch. > > A valid point, let's see what happens with a PR bump: > I think that bumping the PR is not enough to rebuild a package. The sstate cache needs to be invalidated and bumped as well with HASHEQUIV_HASH_VERSION. PR = "r1" HASHEQUIV_HASH_VERSION .= ".1" Jose > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/50/builds/5072 > > I see plenty of rebuilds in process . . . > > Steve > > > > -- Best regards, José Quaresma
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#164352): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/164352 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/90107518/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
