On Wed, 2022-04-13 at 11:39 -1000, Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 9:05 AM Ralph Siemsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 2:19 PM Steve Sakoman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Yes, and it appears they had a quite similar bug in the past! > > > > > > https://lists.debian.org/deity/2006/07/msg00074.html > > > > Interesting find... though it seems that is in a different sha256 > > implementation than the one being used here ("Gifford"). > > I did another experiment, where I disabled generation of the sha256 > entries in Release (by adding --no-sha256 to the apt-ftparchive > command) > > As a result we get past this first hash mismatch in Release, but then > get later hash mismatches when it tries to download .debs. > > https://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Details/654717/ > > So it really does seem that apt sha256 generation is broken on > non-debian distros. > > > The other factor is that it behaves on ubuntu, but not fedora. Do the > > native packages get built with the host gcc (11.2 on fedora 35, > > whereas 9.3 on ubuntu 20.x)? Or does yocto also build a native > > toolchain to build host packages with? > > Perhaps Richard can answer this question!
Native recipes are built using the host gcc so this could be host gcc dependent. We do use buildtools-tarball on some hosts where the gcc is too old. You can see what is used where in config.json in autobuilder-helper near the end. Cheers, Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#164372): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/164372 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/90107518/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
