On 02/02/2012 10:59 AM, Joshua Lock wrote:
> On 02/02/12 10:54, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>> Op 2 feb. 2012, om 19:51 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende
>> geschreven:
>>
>>> Several BSP's are appending netbase to add MACHINE specific
>>> networking functionality. Rather than BSP creators having to
>>> mark netbase MACHINE specific just default to PACKAGE_ARCH =
>>> "${MACHINE_ARCH}" in netbase.
>>>
>>> This shouldn't be a huge hit as netbase just copies files
>>> around.
>>
>> In the past OE would mark things machine specific if something in
>> SRC_URI was fetched using overrides. So it this patches fixed
>> netbase the 'old' mechanism is broken :(
>
> This patch doesn't fix netbase, I just thought it would be simpler to
> make this change than ensure all BSP's use appropriate OVERRIDEs in
> their netbase bbappends - several I've seen don't.
>
Is there a consensus on whether or not this can go in? I need either
this or the BSP layer fix for a new BSP. It seems to me that netbase is
overridden enough for machine specific things (like the interface file)
that Joshua's approach is the better fix.
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
