Op 6 feb. 2012 om 19:33 heeft Joshua Lock <[email protected]> het volgende 
geschreven:

> On 04/02/12 08:07, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> 
>> Op 3 feb. 2012, om 18:15 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 02/02/2012 10:59 AM, Joshua Lock wrote:
>>>> On 02/02/12 10:54, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Op 2 feb. 2012, om 19:51 heeft Joshua Lock het volgende
>>>>> geschreven:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Several BSP's are appending netbase to add MACHINE specific
>>>>>> networking functionality. Rather than BSP creators having to
>>>>>> mark netbase MACHINE specific just default to PACKAGE_ARCH =
>>>>>> "${MACHINE_ARCH}" in netbase.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This shouldn't be a huge hit as netbase just copies files
>>>>>> around.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In the past OE would mark things machine specific if something in
>>>>> SRC_URI was fetched using overrides. So it this patches fixed
>>>>> netbase the 'old' mechanism is broken :(
>>>> 
>>>> This patch doesn't fix netbase, I just thought it would be simpler to
>>>> make this change than ensure all BSP's use appropriate OVERRIDEs in
>>>> their netbase bbappends - several I've seen don't.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Is there a consensus on whether or not this can go in? I need either
>>> this or the BSP layer fix for a new BSP. It seems to me that netbase is
>>> overridden enough for machine specific things (like the interface file)
>>> that Joshua's approach is the better fix.
>> 
>> It all depends on how much crap in BSPs you want to fix up in OE-core. Where 
>> are you going to draw the line?
> 
> I understand you don't like this change but I don't really understand why?
> 
> My intention with the patch is to make it easier for folks to produce BSP's 
> which don't introduce bugs into other builds for the same architecture.

You're not making it easier, you're just fixing up bugs in the BSP in oe-core. 
So where do you draw the line on that?



> 
> Cheers,
> Joshua
> -- 
> Joshua Lock
>        Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
>        Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to