Op 13 feb. 2012, om 22:53 heeft Martin Jansa het volgende geschreven: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:52:30AM +0000, Lu, Lianhao wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> It works if you -c cleansstate on a bunch of recipes, pango, cairo, >>>>>> fontconfig, gtk+, etc >>>>> >> >> I tried rpm-native after "-c cleansstate", but it still asks for libz.la? >> Anyone has the clue? > > one .la still with libz.la in dependency tree is enough to pollute all > .la files even when they get rebuild thanks to PR bump. > > That's why I sent another wider round of PR bumps to oe-core and also to > all layers (oe-core, meta-openembedded/*, meta-smartphone/*) I'm using at > once, > because ie libsoup-2.4 from meta-efl wasn't PR bumped and was still pulling > libz.la to all .la files depending on libsoup :/. > > And even my wider PR bump round isn't 100% complete for everybody, > because it's based on sysroot popultated by my builds and you can have > different .la files there (from different recipe versions or different > layers).
Saul and I discussed this yesterday and we also suspect using --as-needed in LDFLAGS limits the impact of this problem. But still, PR bumps are needed to keep the -dev packages in the feeds working. regards, Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
