On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 14:53, Otavio Salvador <[email protected]> wrote: > I think the Barebox inside OE-Core allows a bigger integration and > reuse of existing tooling for signing and other classes currently well > integrated with U-Boot. For me, a critical point for decision is if > Pengutronix will commit to support it.
You should be well aware there's a history of people contributing stuff to core and even assigning themselves as maintainers, then disappearing. And then it falls (largely) on me to keep things (barely) going. What happens if ptx withdraws its commitment? Can I then send a commit that removes barebox from core? Imagine the angry lynch mob that will show up after my head. Adding things to core is a decision that cannot be easily reversed, so I'd rather have barebox in meta-barebox for a while, with any needed fixing to classes and infra in core. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#177197): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177197 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96956667/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
