Em qua., 15 de fev. de 2023 às 11:11, Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> escreveu: > > On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 at 14:53, Otavio Salvador > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the Barebox inside OE-Core allows a bigger integration and > > reuse of existing tooling for signing and other classes currently well > > integrated with U-Boot. For me, a critical point for decision is if > > Pengutronix will commit to support it. > > You should be well aware there's a history of people contributing > stuff to core and even assigning themselves as maintainers, then > disappearing. And then it falls (largely) on me to keep things > (barely) going. What happens if ptx withdraws its commitment? Can I > then send a commit that removes barebox from core? Imagine the angry > lynch mob that will show up after my head.
Yes. If no one maintains, it should be removed. People will get mad but then we'll see more commitment in future. > Adding things to core is a decision that cannot be easily reversed, so > I'd rather have barebox in meta-barebox for a while, with any needed > fixing to classes and infra in core. Sure but adding things to the core should still be possible and it is a place to foster work sharing and contribution. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#177200): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/177200 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/96956667/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
