On Mon, 15 May 2023 at 10:17, Michael Opdenacker via
lists.yoctoproject.org
<[email protected]> wrote:
> > New this week: 3 CVEs
> > CVE-2022-21227 (CVSS3: 7.5 HIGH): sqlite3:sqlite3-native 
> > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2022-21227 *
> > CVE-2023-2426 (CVSS3: 5.5 MEDIUM): vim 
> > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-2426 *
> > CVE-2023-2610 (CVSS3: 7.8 HIGH): vim 
> > https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2023-2610 *
>
>
> The number of vulnerabilities coming from vim week after week, year
> after year, is always striking to me. Could it be because of lower code
> quality compared to other projects of similar complexity? Could the
> situation be better if we supported neovim instead?

They have some kind of bounty program going.

nano please :) I tend to agree, there is no reason to carry
specifically vim as 'an editor for quick config file hacks on the
target'.

Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#181234): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/181234
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/98899279/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to