Hi, On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:33:39AM +0000, Ross Burton wrote: > On 15 May 2023, at 09:41, Alexander Kanavin via lists.yoctoproject.org > <[email protected]> wrote: > > nano please :) I tend to agree, there is no reason to carry > > specifically vim as 'an editor for quick config file hacks on the > > target’. > > Nano is GPL 3, there’s an argument that our default editor should be as > permissive as possible. I’m not sure what a suitable alternative would be, > though.
busybox vi? Good enough for most embedded and admin use cases. Cheers, -Mikko
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#181238): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/181238 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/98899279/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
