A better option: fix the libpam recipe to say:

ANY_OF_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam systemd"
instead of  current
REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam"


This should avoid having to fix the tests.

Alex

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 19:33, Alexander Kanavin via
lists.openembedded.org <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Please do not rapid-send new patches before I get a chance to look
> into what went wrong.
>
> I suppose we have to add pam to REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES in the
> systemd recipe, then fix all the spots where systemd is enabled, but
> pam is not. For example the above is from
> ../meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/overlayfs.py.
>
> Yes, it's also possible to suppress the runtime message through log
> checker exception list, but this would sweep the issue under the
> carpet. Soft failure is still a failure.
>
> Alex
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 19:22, Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 18:13, Alexandre Belloni
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 31/07/2023 17:56:05+0100, Luca Bocassi wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 17:40, Alexandre Belloni
> > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > This causes the following failure:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/typhoon/#/builders/87/builds/5570/steps/14/logs/stdio
> > > > >
> > > > > 2023-07-30 21:25:44,944 - oe-selftest - INFO - 
> > > > > testtools.testresult.real._StringException: Traceback (most recent 
> > > > > call last):
> > > > >   File 
> > > > > "/home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-ubuntu/build/meta/lib/oeqa/selftest/cases/overlayfs.py",
> > > > >  line 297, in test_all_required_variables_set
> > > > >     self.assertTrue(line, msg=res.output)
> > > > >   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/unittest/case.py", line 687, in assertTrue
> > > > >     raise self.failureException(msg)
> > > > > AssertionError: None is not true : NOTE: Reconnecting to bitbake 
> > > > > server...
> > > > > Loading cache...done.
> > > > > Loaded 0 entries from dependency cache.
> > > > > Parsing recipes...done.
> > > > > Parsing of 954 .bb files complete (0 cached, 954 parsed). 1878 
> > > > > targets, 53 skipped, 0 masked, 0 errors.
> > > > > NOTE: Resolving any missing task queue dependencies
> > > > > ERROR: Nothing RPROVIDES 'pam-plugin-umask' (but 
> > > > > /home/pokybuild/yocto-worker/oe-selftest-ubuntu/build/meta/recipes-core/systemd/systemd_254.bb
> > > > >  RDEPENDS on or otherwise requires it)
> > > > > NOTE: Runtime target 'pam-plugin-umask' is unbuildable, removing...
> > > > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['pam-plugin-umask']
> > > > > NOTE: Runtime target 'udev' is unbuildable, removing...
> > > > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['udev', 
> > > > > 'pam-plugin-umask']
> > > > > NOTE: Runtime target 'packagegroup-core-boot' is unbuildable, 
> > > > > removing...
> > > > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: 
> > > > > ['packagegroup-core-boot', 'udev', 'pam-plugin-umask']
> > > > > ERROR: Required build target 'core-image-minimal' has no buildable 
> > > > > providers.
> > > > > Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['core-image-minimal', 
> > > > > 'packagegroup-core-boot', 'udev', 'pam-plugin-umask']
> > > > > Summary: There were 2 ERROR messages, returning a non-zero exit code.
> > > > >
> > > > > It repeats for other runtime tests.
> > > >
> > > > I added that on Alex's request. So it's either that failure, or the
> > > > ignorable log message? I'll send a v5 without the recommends then.
> > >
> > > In any case, you are going to have to fix the tests
> >
> > Which test? There was a warning if the optional pam module is not
> > installed, just ignore it, it's harmless.
>
> 
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#185155): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/185155
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100459438/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to