On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 18:14, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > > Luca > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 1:12 AM Luca Bocassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 19:00, Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 18:37, Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > A better option: fix the libpam recipe to say: > > > > > > > > ANY_OF_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam systemd" > > > > instead of current > > > > REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam" > > > > > > > > > > > > This should avoid having to fix the tests. > > > > > > Thanks for the suggestion, applied in v6. > > > > Hi, did v6 help with those test runs? Thanks > > > I am seeing a build failure with TCLIBC=musl > > | ../git/src/basic/user-util.c:708:30: error: use of undeclared > identifier 'LOCK_EX'; did you mean 'LOCK_BSD'? > | 708 | r = unposix_lock(fd, LOCK_EX); > | | ^~~~~~~ > | | LOCK_BSD > | ../git/src/basic/lock-util.h:38:9: note: 'LOCK_BSD' declared here > | 38 | LOCK_BSD, > | | ^ > | 1 error generated.
Yes, as mentioned on the patch note itself, I only rebased the musl patches so that they apply (and dropped the merged ones), but I have not (and will not) test them in any other way, as I do not use musl. Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#185419): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/185419 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/100459438/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
