Richard Purdie <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quinta,
7/09/2023 à(s) 16:20:

> On Thu, 2023-09-07 at 15:59 +0100, Jose Quaresma wrote:
> >
> >
> > Richard Purdie <[email protected]> escreveu no dia
> > quinta, 7/09/2023 à(s) 15:16:
> > > On Tue, 2023-08-29 at 14:35 +0000, Jose Quaresma wrote:
> > > > This will match other deviation subtask of the same main task,
> > > > a couple of them can be found on oe-core layer:
> > > >   do_compile_kernelmodules
> > > >   do_compile_ptest
> > > >   native_add_do_populate_sysroot_deps
> > > >   do_package_qa
> > > >   cmake_do_configure
> > > >   setuptools3_do_configure
> > > >   cargo_common_do_configure
> > > >   python_pyo3_do_configure
> > > >   python_setuptools3_rust_do_configure
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jose Quaresma <[email protected]>
> > > > ---
> > > >   scripts/pybootchartgui/pybootchartgui/draw.py | 18 +++++++++---
> > > > ------
> > > >   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/scripts/pybootchartgui/pybootchartgui/draw.py
> > > > b/scripts/pybootchartgui/pybootchartgui/draw.py
> > > > index 3d1ff695c1..2beb3c7c67 100644
> > > > --- a/scripts/pybootchartgui/pybootchartgui/draw.py
> > > > +++ b/scripts/pybootchartgui/pybootchartgui/draw.py
> > > > @@ -661,20 +661,20 @@ def render_processes_chart(ctx, options,
> > > > trace, curr_y, width, h, sec_w):
> > > >
> > > >               #print("proc at %s %s %s %s" % (x, y, w, proc_h))
> > > >               col = None
> > > > -            if task == "do_compile":
> > > > +            if "_setscene" in task:
> > > > +                col = WHITE
> > > > +            elif "do_compile" in task:
> > > >                   col = TASK_COLOR_COMPILE
> > > > -            elif task == "do_configure":
> > > > +            elif "do_configure" in task:
> > > >                   col = TASK_COLOR_CONFIGURE
> > > > -            elif task == "do_install":
> > > > +            elif "do_install" in task:
> > > >                   col = TASK_COLOR_INSTALL
> > > > -            elif task == "do_populate_sysroot":
> > > > +            elif "do_populate_sysroot" in task:
> > > >                   col = TASK_COLOR_SYSROOT
> > > > -            elif task == "do_package":
> > > > -                col = TASK_COLOR_PACKAGE
> > > > -            elif task == "do_package_write_rpm" or \
> > > > -                     task == "do_package_write_deb" or \
> > > > -                     task == "do_package_write_ipk":
> > > > +            elif "do_package_write" in task:
> > > >                   col = TASK_COLOR_PACKAGE_WRITE
> > > > +            elif "do_package" in task:
> > > > +                col = TASK_COLOR_PACKAGE
> > > >               else:
> > > >                   col = WHITE
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm a bit torn on this as the patch changes the approach of the
> > > code.
> > >
> > > Currently, the tasks are marked without any fuzz, i.e. it matches
> > > do_compile alone. The code is entirely consistent in that all the
> > > other
> > > areas match specific tasks too.
> > >
> > > After the change you're changing the meaning to "any compile task"
> > > and
> > > "any configure task".
> > >
> >
> >
> > Yeah that was my intention and they still be consistent by color but
> > now
> > matching a sequential group of tasks:
> >
> > "any configure task" -> "any compile task" -> "any package task" ->
> > "any package write task" -> "do_populate_sysroot"
> >
> > and in this way it is easier to identify the color patterns of the
> > above groups,
> > currently we get a couple of white bars for the majority of the
> > tasks.
> >
> > >
> > > I'm not entirely convinced this is a good thing. Should do_package
> > > match do_package_qa for example? Those are quite different. I think
> > > we're swapping something which is currently at least quite clear
> > > for
> > > something which is very fuzzy and not easy for the user to
> > > understand
> > > without looking at the code :/.
> > >
> >
> >
> > I can rework the patch to have the same colors as before with more
> > new colors
> > for the new tasks I added but with many colors It will be harder to
> > understand.
>
> How about a compromise. Keep do_compile and "compile like" tasks
> separate and use a pale version of the compile colour for "compile
> like". Do something similar for configure and leave the others
> unchanged?
>

Ok, I will do that.


>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>


-- 
Best regards,

José Quaresma
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#187390): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/187390
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/101032261/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to