On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:47:43PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 21:14 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Op 21 mrt. 2012, om 20:42 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: > >> > >> > On 03/21/2012 07:25 AM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: > >> >> * This move will allow the testing of meta-kde for users without > >> >> meta-openembedded. > >> >> > >> > So what other layers are using giflib? > >> > > >> > Your suggesting that we need to have it in oe-core so people don't need > >> > to add the meta-openembedded layer when using meta-kde? > >> > > >> > I am just trying to get more data before making a decision. > >> > >> Let's put everything in oe-core!
And then again and again! > > > > Let's try and be constructive ;-). > > > > I think to make a good decision about this we need to understand which > > layers use giflib. > > > > Is this really the only component from meta-oe that meta-kde needs? If > > it is, I think the request is certainly worth thinking about as we do > > want to try and minimise and untangle the dependency spider web if we > > can. > > > > I think this library could belong to OE-Core since its a library for GIF > images > its currently used by EFL libs. Putting it in OE-Core would be a better thing > IMO since it seems common library FWIW: meta-efl depends on more stuff from meta-oe so moving giflib won't remove meta-oe dependency from meta-efl. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
