2012/3/21 Koen Kooi <[email protected]>: > > Op 21 mrt. 2012, om 20:42 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven: > >> On 03/21/2012 07:25 AM, Samuel Stirtzel wrote: >>> * This move will allow the testing of meta-kde for users without >>> meta-openembedded. >>> >> So what other layers are using giflib? >> >> Your suggesting that we need to have it in oe-core so people don't need to >> add the meta-openembedded layer when using meta-kde? >> >> I am just trying to get more data before making a decision. > > Let's put everything in oe-core!
Otherwise it would require to maintain a redundant copy of giflib in meta-kde. Alternative suggestions are welcome. A grep shows that not many recipes depend on giflib: - samuel@s-stirtzel-linux:/work/oe-core/setup-scripts/sources$ grep -r 'giflib' * meta-java/recipes-core/openjdk/openjdk-6-common.inc:DEPENDS = "giflib libpng jpeg cups \ meta-java/recipes-core/icedtea/icedtea6-native.inc: freetype-native zlib-native giflib-native jpeg-native \ meta-kde/recipes-kde-base/kdelibs4_git.bb:DEPENDS = "automoc4-native strigi libdbusmenu-qt soprano shared-desktop-ontologies dbus giflib attica jpeg libpng bzip2 libpcre perl-native" meta-openembedded/meta-efl/recipes-efl/efl/evas.inc:DEPENDS = "librsvg eina eet freetype jpeg libpng virtual/libx11 libxext libxrender fontconfig libfribidi giflib" - Any reason against the move? -- Regards Samuel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
