On 11/23/23 09:26, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
I'm not sure I agree. It's totally ok to depend on things that are not in core, if they're not enabled or tested on the AB by default, and what layer they're in is well known (meta-oe in this case).
The lzop is called in oe-core and I was under the impression that oe-core shouldn't depend on anything except bitbake . So either this stuff should be moved to meta-oe too (which would be unfortunate growth of dependencies) or the lzop should be reinstated . I would obviously be in favor of the later.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#191175): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/191175 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102759947/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
