On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 22:07, Marek Vasut <[email protected]> wrote:

> The lzop is called in oe-core and I was under the impression that
> oe-core shouldn't depend on anything except bitbake . So either this
> stuff should be moved to meta-oe too (which would be unfortunate growth
> of dependencies) or the lzop should be reinstated . I would obviously be
> in favor of the later.

There are plenty of recipes in oe-core that have optional features
(enabled via PACKAGECONFIG) that depend on recipes that are not in
core. If you enable them, bitbake will say that the needed recipe is
missing and then you need to figure out which layer to add (typically
something in meta-openembedded tree). This is not that different:
optional feature, disabled by default, and the error will be the same:
missing lzop recipe.

Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#191177): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/191177
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/102759947/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to