SIGGEN_EXCLUDE_SAFE_RECIPE_DEPS is weaker version of SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE to mark it ABI safe only for some recipes. As you mark it ABI safe globally then the os-release entries in SIGGEN_EXCLUDE_SAFE_RECIPE_DEPS shouldn't be needed, they don't harm except few more cpu cycles, I've just noticed it's strange.
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 6:31 PM Jose Quaresma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Martin Jansa <[email protected]> escreveu (sexta, 24/05/2024 à(s) 17:22): >> >> >> diff --git a/meta/conf/layer.conf b/meta/conf/layer.conf >> >> index f2bca0aa5ba..65eb657fd93 100644 >> >> --- a/meta/conf/layer.conf >> >> +++ b/meta/conf/layer.conf >> >> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ SIGGEN_EXCLUDERECIPES_ABISAFE += " \ >> >> ca-certificates \ >> >> shared-mime-info \ >> >> desktop-file-utils \ >> >> + os-release \ >> > >> > >> > Acked-by: Jose Quaresma <[email protected]> >> > >> > I've had this on the Linux microPlatform distro for a while now but I >> > forgot to submit >> > https://github.com/foundriesio/meta-lmp/blob/efe9acade717181a5b9d3c520d90aa53049abb27/meta-lmp-base/conf/layer.conf#L37 >> >> You can drop few lines from SIGGEN_EXCLUDE_SAFE_RECIPE_DEPS there as well :). > > > I can try to see if I still need to have it, this one was to store and re-use > the initramfs on the sstate-cache. > Without that I sometimes need to rebuild the kernel when this would not be > necessary. > All of that was validated on the kirkstone branch. > > Anyway, I will take a look. > > Thanks for the tip. > > -- > Best regards, > > José Quaresma
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#199859): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/199859 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/106283450/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
