> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Steve Sakoman
> Sent: den 16 oktober 2024 15:27
> To: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [OE-core][scarthgap 17/18] image_qa: fix error handling
> 
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 3:41 PM Richard Purdie 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2024-10-15 at 11:50 -0700, Steve Sakoman via lists.openembedded.org 
> > wrote:
> > > From: Louis Rannou <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > Make ImageQAFailed inherit BBHandledException so exceptions raised in 
> > > tests are
> > > catched when the actual test function is executed by bb.utils.better_exec.
> > >
> > > Change the do_image_qa tasks so errors are handled with 
> > > oe.qa.handle_error. Add
> > > some comment to explain this requires to list the test in ERROR_QA or 
> > > WARN_QA.
> > >
> > > [YOCTO #14807]
> > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14807
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Louis Rannou <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]>
> > > (cherry picked from commit 905e224849fbbed1719e0add231b00e2d570b3b4)
> > > Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  meta/classes-recipe/image.bbclass | 11 ++++++-----
> > >  meta/lib/oe/utils.py              |  2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta/classes-recipe/image.bbclass 
> > > b/meta/classes-recipe/image.bbclass
> > > index 28be6c6362..a682b5f3b2 100644
> > > --- a/meta/classes-recipe/image.bbclass
> > > +++ b/meta/classes-recipe/image.bbclass
> > > @@ -308,23 +308,24 @@ addtask do_image_complete_setscene
> > >  #
> > >  # The functions should use ${IMAGE_ROOTFS} to find the unpacked rootfs
> > >  # directory, which if QA passes will be the basis for the images.
> > > +#
> > > +# The functions should use oe.utils.ImageQAFailed(description, name) to 
> > > raise
> > > +# errors. The name must be listed in ERROR_QA or WARN_QA to prompt.
> > >  fakeroot python do_image_qa () {
> > >      from oe.utils import ImageQAFailed
> > >
> > >      qa_cmds = (d.getVar('IMAGE_QA_COMMANDS') or '').split()
> > > -    qamsg = ""
> > >
> > >      for cmd in qa_cmds:
> > >          try:
> > >              bb.build.exec_func(cmd, d)
> > >          except oe.utils.ImageQAFailed as e:
> > > -            qamsg = qamsg + '\tImage QA function %s failed: %s\n' % 
> > > (e.name, e.description)
> > > +            qamsg = 'Image QA function %s failed: %s\n' % (e.name, 
> > > e.description)
> > > +            oe.qa.handle_error(e.name, qamsg, d)
> > >          except Exception as e:
> > >              qamsg = qamsg + '\tImage QA function %s failed: %s\n' % 
> > > (cmd, e)
> > >
> > > -    if qamsg:
> > > -        imgname = d.getVar('IMAGE_NAME')
> > > -        bb.fatal("QA errors found whilst validating image: %s\n%s" % 
> > > (imgname, qamsg))
> > > +    oe.qa.exit_if_errors(d)
> > >  }
> > >  addtask do_image_qa after do_rootfs before do_image
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/utils.py b/meta/lib/oe/utils.py
> > > index 14a7d07ef0..83f1440887 100644
> > > --- a/meta/lib/oe/utils.py
> > > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/utils.py
> > > @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ def get_multilib_datastore(variant, d):
> > >          localdata.setVar("MLPREFIX", "")
> > >      return localdata
> > >
> > > -class ImageQAFailed(Exception):
> > > +class ImageQAFailed(bb.BBHandledException):
> > >      def __init__(self, description, name=None, logfile=None):
> > >          self.description = description
> > >          self.name = name
> > >
> >
> > This caused further issues if I remember correctly.
> >
> > https://git.yoctoproject.org/poky/commit/?id=b0eb2b9b3660dfda1c4c43cfcca6a2c4a84d6dc8
> >
> > for example.
> 
> Thanks for reviewing!  I've got that one now and will also take it for
> styhead.
> 
> Steve

Do note that I sent an alternative patch for Styhead that does not 
remove the ImageQAFailed exception. While I would be happy to see the 
version that went into master backported, I assumed that removing the 
ImageQAFailed exception would be considered as a change in behavior 
and thus not eligible for backporting.

The alternative version I created for Styhead can be found here:

https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/204982

//Peter

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#206068): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/206068
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/109030208/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to