Am Dienstag, dem 12.11.2024 um 10:39 +0100 schrieb Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 10:25, wangmy via lists.openembedded.org > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: Wang Mingyu <[email protected]> > > > > Signed-off-by: Wang Mingyu <[email protected]> > > --- > > .../{barebox-tools_2024.09.0.bb => barebox-tools_2024.10.0.bb} | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > rename meta/recipes-bsp/barebox/{barebox-tools_2024.09.0.bb => > > barebox-tools_2024.10.0.bb} > > (93%) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-bsp/barebox/barebox-tools_2024.09.0.bb > > b/meta/recipes- > > bsp/barebox/barebox-tools_2024.10.0.bb > > similarity index 93% > > rename from meta/recipes-bsp/barebox/barebox-tools_2024.09.0.bb > > rename to meta/recipes-bsp/barebox/barebox-tools_2024.10.0.bb > > index 13a308b3da..386656f7ad 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-bsp/barebox/barebox-tools_2024.09.0.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-bsp/barebox/barebox-tools_2024.10.0.bb > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = > > "file://COPYING;md5=f5125d13e000b9ca1f0d3364286c4192" > > DEPENDS = "bison-native flex-native libusb1" > > > > SRC_URI = "https://barebox.org/download/barebox-${PV}.tar.bz2"; > > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > > "4d4ea7e232aeba2b3cb9ccf0dbf8cd8e01c65b6c615f64c3bd0c4f24f23a47da" > > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] = > > "955b20bfa7358732d2c0c09ccfd4c1a69087b7e2c610b16dee7442d71a5af88d" > > Main barebox recipe needs to be updated at the same time.
Last time I updated this, I assumed my version bump patch was not taken because patchtest complained about a missing description. Thus I took a look at other version bumps and decided it might be desired to have a short note on the main changes or a link to the changelog in the commit message. Is that the case? Are the changes I see in other recipes all generated by hand? Another thing I noticed is that I did not get a mail from the AUH for barebox-tools 2024.10 so far. (But this would update barebox-tools only, maybe for the same reason the maintainer check failed initially (barebox recipe not being a default provider)). > I think we need to put SRC_URI items into a shared .inc file, > otherwise people will easily forget about this, and update one recipe > but not the other. Looks like this currently is the way to ensure this, yes. Can the upgrade helper handle this properly? I wouldn't yet do it now to not interfere with these patches, but If I should step in, just let me know. Thanks and Regards, Enrico > Alex > > > -- Pengutronix e.K. | Enrico Jörns | Embedded Linux Consulting & Support | https://www.pengutronix.de/ | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | Phone: +49-5121-206917-180 | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#207044): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/207044 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/109531959/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
