On Tue, 12 Nov 2024 at 12:25, Enrico Jörns <[email protected]> wrote: > Last time I updated this, I assumed my version bump patch was not taken > because patchtest complained > about a missing description. > Thus I took a look at other version bumps and decided it might be desired to > have a short note on > the main changes or a link to the changelog in the commit message. > Is that the case? Are the changes I see in other recipes all generated by > hand?
The changelog is not required. And missing description is not a hard blocker; it's at the discretion of the submitter to add something. > Another thing I noticed is that I did not get a mail from the AUH for > barebox-tools 2024.10 so far. > (But this would update barebox-tools only, maybe for the same reason the > maintainer check failed > initially (barebox recipe not being a default provider)). The last AUH run got somehow stuck and was killed on timeout. I'd wait and see what happens in three days time. > > I think we need to put SRC_URI items into a shared .inc file, > > otherwise people will easily forget about this, and update one recipe > > but not the other. > > Looks like this currently is the way to ensure this, yes. Can the upgrade > helper handle this > properly? I wouldn't yet do it now to not interfere with these patches, but > If I should step in, > just let me know. Yes. AUH detects if recipes share an include file, and if so, updates them in lockstep and makes a single patch. Alex
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#207046): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/207046 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/109531959/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
