> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 17:37 > To: [email protected]; Marko, Peter (FT D EU SK BFS1) > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; ,openembedded- > [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Status 20 January 2026 (WW03) > > On Wed, 2026-01-21 at 13:15 +0000, Peter Marko via lists.yoctoproject.org > wrote: > > > Tracking Metrics: > > > > > > * WDD 3041 (last week 3026) > > > (https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/charts/combo.html > > > <https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/charts/combo.html> ) > > > > > > * OE-Core/Poky Patch Metrics > > > > > > * Total patches found: 1099 (last week 1089) > > > > > > * Patches in the Pending State: 152 (14%) [last week 151 (14%)] > > > > > > * https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/non-release/patchmetrics/ > > > <https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/non-release/patchmetrics/> > > > > Would be nice to update this link which points to abandoned infrastructure > > with > last update from 2024-10. > > New URL is https://valkyrie.yocto.io/pub/non-release/patchmetrics/ > > Well spotted, we should fix that, yes. > > > But that one is also a bit outdated, so someone could be so nice and merge > these two series to add whinlatter... > > * https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto-patches/message/2935 (2 patches) > > * https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto-patches/message/2937 (3 patches) > > I keep looking at these, realising you also dropped styhead as well and > that then means me not finding the time to reply about that. > > Adding whinlatter is an easy add. Dropping styhead is more contentious > as we've been trying to continue to collect metrics beyond the release. > I've not wanted to get into a discussion about why we might do that, > for how long and so on.
The patches are only removing "list of current open CVEs" from the page. The release will still be shown in graphs like all the other old releases which don't have current CVE list. Reason is that styhead metrics are no longer generated so the list is very old. I can also resend without that part if you want it, but I think it's correct to remove that part. Peter > > No, we don't have a policy, it isn't documented, we should have one, we > should document it, someone needs to do it, I haven't had time. As > anyone who's attended the weekly status calls knows, I'm drowning. > > So if we want to move forward, I'm fine adding whinlatter if you want > to resend with that bit first. > > Cheers, > > Richard > > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#229821): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/229821 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117380636/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
