On Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 2:42 PM CET, Bruce Ashfield via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 8:19 AM Richard Purdie < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2026-02-10 at 11:09 +0100, Mathieu Dubois-Briand wrote: >> > On Fri Feb 6, 2026 at 9:27 PM CET, Bruce Ashfield via >> lists.openembedded.org wrote: >> > > From: Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> >> > > >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > Here's my series for the two repositories combined into one. >> > > I usually do end up missing some reference to the old kernels, >> > > so I'm never completely sure that I've gotten them all. >> > > >> > > But with this (and thanks to Kevin getting the beaglebone >> > > working with 6.18/standard/base), we are down to just the >> > > single reference kernel. >> > > >> > > As usual, I'll continue updating any kernel that is active >> > > upstream, and I'll send -stable updates to the appropriate >> > > branches. >> > > >> > > I also plan to make my scripts available for those that may >> > > want to bump SRCREVs by themselves to continue consuming my >> > > merges. >> > > >> > > I'm out for the weekend, but will pick up any issues with >> > > this on first thing Monday morning. >> > >> > Looks correct on the autobuilder. >> > >> > Just a quick note for Jan-Simon: once merged, this will break meta- >> > agl >> > layer, as it refers to 6.16 as a preferred version: >> > >> > WARNING: preferred version 6.16% of linux-yocto not available (for >> > item virtual/kernel) >> > WARNING: versions of linux-yocto available: 6.18.8+git >> > >> > https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/55/builds/2987 >> >> It mostly worked in my testing except for: >> >> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/60/builds/3148 >> https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/valkyrie/#/builders/22/builds/3176 >> >> linux-yocto-6.18.7+git-r0 do_kernel_version_sanity_check: Package Version >> (6.18.7+git) does not match of kernel being built (6.18.8). Please update >> the PV variable to match the kernel source or set >> KERNEL_VERSION_SANITY_SKIP="1" in your recipe. >> >> Did I miss a patch or something? >> > > Something may have misfired in my scripts. I'm still adapting them > to non-poky combo layer. > > I'll have a look and see if one of mv PVs didn't bump properly. > > Bruce >
I believe your series is complete, as it did build correctly with my branch. I think Richard is missing some commits in his branch, including: linux-yocto/6.18: update to v6.18.8 Just a note about the process while we are at it: picking this series was not straightforward, at least with b4: it got confused by patches 1-4 appearing twice (1 oe-core, 1 meta-yocto). It was not a big deal and I have no suggestion for a better process so far, but it would be helpful if patch numbers were unique. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#230900): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/230900 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117678889/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
