On Tue Feb 10, 2026 at 3:18 PM CET, Bruce Ashfield via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 9:08 AM Mathieu Dubois-Briand < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Just a note about the process while we are at it: picking this series >> was not straightforward, at least with b4: it got confused by patches >> 1-4 appearing twice (1 oe-core, 1 meta-yocto). It was not a big deal and >> I have no suggestion for a better process so far, but it would be >> helpful if patch numbers were unique. >> > > My export scripts are doing that numbering on purpose, so I can definitely > change it if it helps the picking of them. > > I can also just send them to the two separate lists, but I'm trying to > simulate > the unified series so that we don't miss coordinating between the two > lists (and that's why the numbering is individual). > > I do have a "flat mode" in the tools, and that would just number them from > 0-N through the entire series. > > I'm open to either option. I can send 0-N to the single list, or do the two > 0-N sends on separate lists and let the coordination happen on your end > between the two. > > Just let me know which you prefer and I'll switch to it. > > Bruce >
I do not have any strong opinion here. Having two separate 0-N series on the two separate lists is probably the easiest one to pick on my side, but I can understand the advantage of a single series to make sure all patches are picked in coordination. A single series is also a working solution. So I will let others share their opinions. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Dubois-Briand, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#230909): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/230909 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117678889/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
